The Resurrection of the Responsible
Whether or not
someone will be raised depends on whether they are responsible to the
judgment. The basis of our judgment will be how we have responded to our
knowledge of God’s word. Christ explained: “He who rejects Me, and does not
receive My words, has that which judges him - the word that I have spoken
will judge him in the last day” (Jn. 12:48). Those who have not known or
understood the word of Christ, and therefore had no opportunity to accept or
reject him, will not be accountable to the judgment. “As many as have sinned
without (knowing God’s) law, will also perish without law, and as many as
have sinned in the law (i.e. knowing it), will be judged by the law” (Rom.
2:12). Thus those who have not known God’s requirements will perish like the
animals; whilst those who knowingly break God’s law need to be judged, and
therefore raised to face that judgment.
In God’s sight “sin is not
imputed when there is no law”; “by the law is the knowledge of sin” (Rom.
5:13; Rom. 3:20). Without being aware of God’s laws as revealed in His Word,
“sin is not imputed” to a person, and therefore they will not be raised or
judged. Those who do not know God’s Word will therefore remain dead, as will
animals and plants, seeing they are in the same position. “Man who...does
not understand, is like the beasts that perish” (Ps. 49:20). “Like sheep
they are laid in the grave” (Ps. 49:14).
It is the knowledge of God’s
ways that makes us responsible to Him for our actions and therefore
necessitates our resurrection and appearance at the judgment seat. It should
therefore be understood that it is not only the righteous or those baptised
who will be raised, but also all who are responsible to God by reason of
their knowledge of Him. This is an oft-repeated Scriptural theme.
Knowledge of God making us responsible to the judgment seat, it follows that those without this knowledge will not be raised, seeing that they do not need to be judged, and that their lack of knowledge makes them “like the beasts that perish” (Ps. 49:20). There are ample indications that not all who have ever lived will be raised.
‘Rising again’ in the Prophets
The argument has been
made that ‘not rising again’ refers to not getting up, not arising from the
ground in the sense of arising in power. But the passages quoted generally
are in the context of death; and therefore the not rising again surely means
that they will not recover from death, they will not arise from the dead,
rather than from some political fall. Is. 26:14 is a clear example of how
the Hebrew poetry rhymes in terms of the ideas:
|
Their dead |
Shall not live |
|
Their deceased |
Shall not rise |
|
You visited and destroyed them |
Caused all memory of them to perish |
Not rising is paralleled with not living; it is a rhyming idea with death
and being deceased. It is another take on being destroyed and not remembered
over future generations. Indeed, it would be fair to argue here that the
Hebrew translated “shall not live”, used as it is here in a causative sense,
could be better rendered ‘shall not be made alive’. Hence GNB: “Now they are
dead and will not live again”. The argument that ‘not rising’ means ‘they
shall not arise in power again’ seems to me rather desperate; and my
question would be, if that is indeed the intention of the Hebrew, then why
did God not use a word which more unambiguously meant that? The Hebrew
translated ‘rise up’ is rather like the Greek egeiro, it is used of
resurrection from the dead, but it can also simply mean to stand up. But the
argument about an ancient Hebrew word is rather sidelined by the parallel in
Is. 26:14 between ‘not rising’ and not being made to live, and being utterly
destroyed, deceased and quite simply “dead”.
Other Points
“All men” being raised in John 5
Whatever these
verses mean, they must be interpreted in the light of all the Bible teaching
and reasoning presented above.
“For the hour comes, in which all that
are in the tombs shall hear his voice, and shall come forth; they that have
done good, to the resurrection of life, and they that have done evil, to the
resurrection of condemnation” (Jn. 5:28,29). The point has been well made
that mnemeion, “graves”, literally means the memorial tombs- those
who are remembered, by God. Even if we insist on reading the “all” here as
literally “all”, believers in universal resurrection are stuck with their
insistence that this mass resurrection of all humanity will be in order to
give the majority the opportunity to hear the Gospel, and then come to some
kind of [dimly specified] further judgment. But let’s continue reading: they
“shall come forth; they that have done good, to the resurrection of life,
and they that have done evil, to the resurrection of condemnation”. The
participants in this resurrection come forth to judgment, and to either
eternal life or death. The preceding verses make it clear that judgment is
in view: “The hour comes and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of
the Son of God; and they that hear shall live. For as the Father has life in
Himself, so He has given the Son life in himself. And He has given him
authority to execute judgment, because he is a Son of Man” (Jn. 5:25-27).
There is no hint whatsoever that the majority of them will come forth to
some in between state, in order to pass through some period of probation.
These people come forth to judgment, and so the “all” must surely be read as
referring to the “all” who are responsible to judgment, and who will receive
eternal life or condemnation at the point of their resurrection and
judgment. If we insist on reading “all” literally, then we would have to
read mnemeion literally- all those in graves shall be
resurrected; and many have died without graves. The context surely requires
that the “all” who are in view here are those who will be liable to
judgment, and their destiny will be decided by the nature of the
resurrection they receive- hence the language of the resurrection of
condemnation and the resurrection to [eternal] life. Anyone with any even
outline familiarity with Semitic languages will know that “all” is not to be
read literally. It is the “all” within a pool of persons or situation which
the context defines. And the “all” here clearly refers to those who are
responsible to judgment. Even reading the Bible in English translations
makes it clear that “all” rarely means ‘every single one’. Just a few
examples of many:
“All Jerusalem” was troubled at the news of Christ’s
birth (Mt. 2:3); not every single man, woman and child, for they likely
never heard the message of the wise men which troubled Herod and “all” those
within the Jerusalem leadership.
“All” Judea and transJordan went out to
John the Baptist and were baptized (Mt. 3:5); again, not literally every
single man, woman and child. We can hardly imagine John baptizing newborn
infants in Jordan.
“All” the sick people of Syria were healed of their
diseases (Mt. 4:24)- surely all who came to Jesus were healed. Again, we
have to define the scope of the “all” from the context, rather than
simplistically insisting that “all” means literally all in a global sense.
“You shall be hated of all men” (Mt. 10:22)- not literally, but “all” of
those within the category of the unbelieving.
The mustard seed is not the
smallest of “all seeds” (Mt. 13:32) on a global level; at best, it might be
the smallest of all seeds known within Israel.
“All things” [Gk. pas,
not as in AV “any thing”] that believers ask will be done for them (Mt.
18:19; 21:22)- but that has to be qualified by other Scripture which teaches
that this “all things” depends upon those all things being within the circle
of God’s will. Again, the “all” is not literally “all”.
The “all men” who
are gathered to the Kingdom are not literally all men, for not all hear the
Gospel of the Kingdom; they are all whom the preachers “found” (Mt. 22:10).
Mt. 22:28 in Greek reads literally “all men had her [to wife]”. The “all”
clearly refers to the seven husbands spoken of in the context.
“All men
seek for You” (Mk. 1:37) refers to the “all men” in the context, which is of
a town in Israel; not the whole planet.
John the Baptist came so that
“all men through him might believe” (Jn. 1:7). The reference is not to the
entire planet, but to the “all men” who heard John’s message in Israel.
The woman at the well marvelled that Jesus had told her “all things that I
ever did” (Jn. 4:39). But she was referring not to literally all things in
her life, but to all things of her marital life; and that is defined in the
context.
The Old Testament prophecy that “They shall all be taught of
God” is defined as “Every man who has heard and learned of the Father” (Jn.
6:45). Note that the Greek pas occurs twice here- “all” [taught of
God] and “every” man. The same double usage of pas is to be found
in Jn. 17:2: “You gave him authority over all flesh, so that he should give
eternal life to all whom You have given him”. The “all men” is defined as
those who shall be ultimately saved, not literally everyone.
The cross
drew “all men” unto Christ (Jn. 12:32)- the “all” of the group within God’s
purpose for salvation, but not literally all men as in every single man,
woman and child.
And so we could continue. “All” simply does not mean
“all” in a literal, global sense. This is particularly the case in John’s
Gospel, where “all men” appears to refer to a specific group, the believers,
the saved. The reference in John 5 to “all men” being raised simply has to
be read in this context.
“The grace of God has appeared… to all
men”
Titus 2:11-14 further defines this “all men”: “For the
grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation to all men. It trains us
to renounce ungodliness and worldly passions, and to live self-controlled,
upright, and Godly lives in this present age, as we look for the blessed
hope : The manifesting of the glory of the great God, and of our Saviour
Jesus Christ, who gave himself for us…”. The “all men” is those to
whom God’s grace has appeared; the “we” and “us” in view are clearly
believers, and they are described as “all things” in Paul’s writings (Eph.
1:10; 3:9; 4:10; Col. 1:16-18,20 ). Tit. 2:11 says that God’s grace
“appeared” to all men; the word means literally to appear as a light, and
the same word is to be found soon afterwards, in Tit. 3:4, where we learn
that God’s grace “appeared” towards us ; and it is the same word as
in Lk. 1:79, where we read that the work of the Lord Jesus was to “give
light” (s.w. ‘appear’) to those that sit in darkness, “to guide our feet
into the way of peace”. The ‘appearance’ was therefore not to every person,
but to those who see the light. These are the “all men” who are in view in
Titus 2. Even in the first century, the Gospel had been made known to “all
nations for the obedience of faith” (Rom. 16:26). But we have to read in an
ellipsis here- the Gospel went to people from all nations, not to
literally every person in every nation; and the “all nations” would appear
to refer to the nations around Israel, for surely the apostles didn’t take
the Gospel to every nation of South America or Australia in the first
century. Likewise in Col. 1:6: “That Gospel is come to you, even as it has
also come to all the world, bearing fruit and increasing, as it does in you
also”. The “all the world” who heard was not literally every person.
FOOTNOTE: Children Who Die
God can and shall do as He
wishes. We cannot draw a circle around God and forbid Him to act outside it.
He may do anything, including universal resurrection or universal salvation;
my point is simply that the Biblical record doesn’t support those positions.
It could be argued from 1 Cor. 7 that the children of believers are somehow
‘covered’ in some way by their parents. But that is a different proposition
to universal resurrection. The faith of the friends led to the paralyzed man
being ‘raised up’ and forgiven (Mk. 2:5). But this again does not give any
hint towards universal resurrection.
Duncan Heaster
Commentary on other passages:
“For this is good and acceptable in the
sight of God our Savior, who desires all men to be saved and to come to the
knowledge of the truth” (1 Tim. 2:3, 4 NKJB)
Again, “all men” doesn’t
mean every human being who has ever lived; I have demonstrated that above.
If God desires all to know His Truth then why have the majority of humanity
never heard it… And the text says He desires all to be saved. But
only very few will be saved… so the Bible states many times. So God’s desire
didn’t come to fulfilment. If God wants all to know the Truth, we either
have to invent the idea of all being raised and given a chance, or, have
another look at whether “all men” means every single human being. And I have
explained above why I go for that option, because “all men” is clearly not
used elsewhere with reference to all human beings of all times. The passage
continues: “who gave himself as a ransom for all”. The “all” are those who
benefit from the Lord’s death, the ransom payment. For even if there were
universal resurrection, there is not going to be universal salvation. So the
“all” who are ransomed is not literally everyone, for not all will be
ransomed- some will not be saved / ransomed. They prefer to stay in bondage
to sin.
“…John saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold! The Lamb
of God who takes away the sin of the world!” (John 1:29). I suggest “the
world” in John’s writings refers often to the Jewish world (note Jn. 8:26;
9:5; 12:19,31; 14:19; 16:20; 18:20); looking through how that phrase is used
in John , it simply cannot mean every human being on the whole planet, nor
does it refer to ‘planet earth’. John 1:9 begins by saying that “the world”
is comprised of those who are enlightened… Logic is rather lacking in using
these verses in John to prove universal resurrection; what they
speak of is universal salvation of “the world”. But seeing not
literally all men will be saved, we must therefore redefine the scope of
“the world”, just as we have to when considering the phrase “all men”, as
demonstrated above.
“Clearly God no longer overlooks ignorance of the
Gospel because of one’s never hearing it - all will be judged, including
those who were earlier ignorant of the Gospel”. This makes no sense to me,
if knowledge is the basis for judgment [see above], then how can people be
judged for what they didn’t know about. Why raise ignorant people to
judgment? There is a time of judgment coming on the world, yes, and those
who hear of it need to repent.
Acts 24:15: “…there is going to be a
resurrection both of [1] the righteous and [2] the unrighteous.” (HCSB). If
this means universal resurrection, then surely a 3rd group is required- the
ignorant who will then be taught the Gospel. But such a group doesn’t
feature here. Those resurrected are righteous or unrighteous and will be
judged accordingly.
“The sea gave up the dead who were in it, and Death
and Hades delivered up the dead who were in them. And they were judged, each
one according to his works” (Rev. 20:13). If this refers to the end of the
1000 years, then it could equally refer to those who die during the 1000
years. However, I am not very persuaded of the idea of a 1000 year reign; it
is based on one figurative passage at the end of Revelation. If the Gospel
of the kingdom involves belief that the everyone will be raised, I’d expect
it to be taught far earlier than the end of Revelation, and to feature in
the apostolic preaching. But it doesn’t.
“But I do not want you to
be ignorant, brethren, concerning those who have fallen asleep, lest you
sorrow as others who have no hope” (1Thess. 4:13). This seems to me to mean
what it says- they have no hope. The obvious meaning of the words and
context of the reasoning seems to be being overlooked by those who insist on
universal resurrection.
“Many (Heb. rabbim) of those who sleep in the
dust of the ground will awake, [1] these to everlasting life, but [2] the
others to disgrace and everlasting (Heb. olam) contempt” (Dan. 12:2 NASB).
Again, the resurrection is the time of judgment. One would expect a 3rd
group, numerically by far the largest, to be mentioned- those who need to be
raised and taught the Gospel. But we don’t encounter that at all. Whether
“many” means ‘multitudes’ or ‘just some’ becomes irrelevant- because the
required ‘third group’ aren’t mentioned anyway.